The fresh Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Personal Partnership Scale (ECP) showed that the original design advised by authors don’t possess an acceptable fit in the modern decide to try ([chi-square] / df = 5.63, GFI = .93, CFI = .86, TLI = .84, RMSEA = .07), particularly in terms of the [chi square] / df, CFI e TLI opinions. From inside the white ones efficiency and you can as a result of the details used (Browne Cudeck, 1992; Hu Bentler, 1999; Segars Grover, 1993) we chose to proceed which have an Exploratory Factor Investigation.
The significance of the effect of the relationship status on the level of personal commitment of the participants was evaluated by the ANOVA one way method, in which the normality (p <
The Exploratory Factor Data of one’s Personal Partnership Level (ECP), by means of Principal Axis Factoring, found the brand new unidimensional framework of the size, just like the only the accessibility to one of several portion achieved the fresh minimal Eigenvalue of just one. This was including evident during the interpretation of the scree-patch graph (Community, 2009).
The accuracy of the dimension are examined from internal texture of your size, in the shape of Cronbach’s leader, in addition to adequacy of each and every item was also affirmed (Desk step 1). It was affirmed you to definitely activities step three and you can 10 failed to satisfy the minimum criteria for addition, into the loading for items 10 below the worthy of thought acceptable, each other had weakened goods-total correlations plus the elimination of one another activities enhanced the full value of Cronbach’s alpha, towards worthy of ahead of reduction are .80. For the white with the research, the selection was made to eliminate these two activities about study (; Nunnally Bernstein, 1994). These materials correspond precisely towards several products the brand new writers envision as actually prior to the new meta-union dimension, thus being officially adequate their empirical differentiation in the remainder of the items and their exception from the scale. The past unidimensional framework, with no referred factors, demonstrates to you % of total difference, with appropriate product-complete correlations (Field, 2009) between .thirty six and .60 with a complete average rating of five.56 (DP = .86). New Cronbach alphas differ between .82 into overall attempt, .83 and you will .81 respectively into the female and male shot. Toward four subgroups, i received escort review Carlsbad CA.82, .80, .70 and .84 respectively having players for the an internet dating relationships, relationship which have cohabitation, formal union and you may married people. We can for this reason believe all of the interior consistency indicator because the an effective (Cronbach, 1970; ).
The average ECP scores in the current sample are as follows, 5.56 (DP = .86) for the total sample, 5.48 (DP = .86) for women and 5.70 (DP = .83) for men. This difference is significant F(1, 922) = ; p < .001; [[eta].sup.2]p = .02.
Continuing with the validation of the Personal Commitment Scale (ECP), we proceeded with the concurrent validity criteria analysis. The global values for personal commitment showed, as expected, significant positive correlations (p < .001) with the total RRF-R (.63) and with all its subscales (Passion, .64; Confidence, .51; Conflicts, .44; Intimacy, .45), which indicate that higher levels of personal commitment correlated with higher indices of relationship quality, in all its dimensions.
A mathematically tall effectation of the connection condition on the individual connection levels of the participants F(3, 920) = 9
Once the described analyses were completed, they were followed by the exploration of the various relationship statuses present in the sample of participants (Table 3) with the results obtained by these in the Portuguese version of the scale thus validated, the ECP. 05 for three of the four types of relationship statuses) and homoscedasticity analyses W(3, 920) = 1.06; p = .298 were sufficiently robust to proceed with the analyses. 59; p < .001; [[eta].sup.2]p = .03 was observed.
دیدگاهتان را بنویسید